Skip to main content
Archaeology

Reading the Bones: Zooarchaeology in Ancient Near East Excavations

How animal bones from sites like Çatalhöyük reveal ancient diets, economies, and rituals. A practical guide to zooarchaeology in the Near East.

Why Animal Bones Matter in Near Eastern Archaeology

When we think of archaeology in the Ancient Near East, we picture monumental ziggurats, cuneiform tablets, and gold masks. But the most common finds at most sites are not glamorous—they are animal bones. These discarded fragments, often overlooked by the public, are a goldmine of information about daily life, economy, and environment.

Zooarchaeology, the study of animal remains from archaeological sites, is a core discipline in Near Eastern fieldwork. It answers questions that texts and architecture cannot: What did people eat? How did they herd? When did they domesticate animals? What role did animals play in ritual? If you are planning to join a dig or simply want to interpret site reports, understanding the basics of faunal analysis is essential.

The Rise of Zooarchaeology in the Region

The systematic study of animal bones in the Near East began in earnest in the mid-20th century. Pioneers like Dexter Perkins and Patricia Daly analyzed faunal assemblages from Jarmo and other early Neolithic sites in Iraq, establishing methods still used today.

Since then, every major excavation—from Tell Brak in Syria to Hattusha in Turkey—includes a faunal specialist. The discipline has grown from simple species lists to complex studies of herd management, seasonality, and even human-animal relationships. This shift reflects a broader trend in archaeology toward understanding ancient lifeways, not just monuments.

Field Basics: What to Do (and Not Do) When You Find Bone

If you encounter bones during an excavation, resist the urge to brush them clean or pick them up casually. Bones are fragile and easily damaged. Follow these steps to ensure they survive for analysis:

  1. Stop digging immediately and alert the trench supervisor or the faunal specialist.
  2. Photograph and record the bone in situ, noting its coordinates, depth, and any associations with nearby artifacts or features.
  3. Do not wash the bone. Washing can remove residues and small fragments. Instead, wrap it in acid-free tissue paper or aluminum foil, then place it in a labeled bag.
  4. Do not glue broken pieces together. Glue can contaminate samples for radiocarbon dating or isotope analysis.
  5. Keep bones from different contexts separate. Mixing them can ruin stratigraphic integrity.
  6. Let the specialists dry them slowly in a shaded area, away from direct sun, to prevent cracking.

Reading the Bones: Key Analyses Explained

Once in the lab, faunal analysts employ a range of techniques. Here is a breakdown of the most common ones:

  • Species identification: Using comparative collections of modern skeletons, analysts identify which animals are present—sheep, goat, cattle, pig, gazelle, and so on.
  • Aging: Tooth eruption and wear, as well as bone fusion, indicate the age at death. This reveals culling strategies—e.g., killing young males for meat while keeping females for milk.
  • Sexing: Pelvic morphology and horn core shape can sometimes determine sex, adding to herd management models.
  • Butchery marks: Cut marks, chop marks, and fracture patterns tell us about meat processing, tool use, and consumption practices.
  • Bone tools: Some bones are not food refuse but raw material for tools—awls, needles, and even ornaments.
  • Stable isotope analysis: Analyzing carbon and nitrogen isotopes in bone collagen reveals diet and environment—whether animals grazed on C3 or C4 plants, and whether they were herded in dry or wet areas.

Case Study: Çatalhöyük's Sheep and Cattle

Çatalhöyük, a 9,000-year-old Neolithic site in central Turkey, is one of the most intensively studied sites for zooarchaeology. Excavations directed by Ian Hodder included a dedicated team of faunal experts led by Nerissa Russell and Louise Martin.

Their work showed that early inhabitants hunted wild cattle and then gradually domesticated them. Sheep were also central, and their bones reveal a pattern of seasonal slaughter—mostly young males in autumn—suggesting a surplus of meat for winter storage. This level of detail helps us reconstruct not just diet but social organization.

Moreover, the presence of cattle horns built into walls suggests that some animals were not just food but symbols of status and ritual. At Çatalhöyük, a single cattle horn installation found in Building 52 carried symbolic weight, likely associated with a feast or a social gathering.

Comparison Table: Sheep vs. Goat in Near Eastern Assemblages

Distinguishing sheep from goats is a classic zooarchaeological challenge. Here is a practical comparison of their bones:

Bone ElementSheep (Ovis)Goat (Capra)
Horn coresTriangular in cross-section, twistedScimitar-shaped, keeled anteriorly
Distal humerusSmooth, no distal grooveDistal groove present
MetacarpalMore slender, proximal articular surface has two facetsWider, proximal articular surface has one facet
PhalangesLonger, more slenderShorter, more robust

These distinctions are not always black-and-white, and hybrids or deformed bones can confuse even experts. That is why analysts often combine morphological traits with genetic analysis when possible.

What Animal Bones Tell Us About Urbanization and Trade

As cities like Uruk and Ur grew, animal economies changed. Zooarchaeological data from Uruk (modern Warka, Iraq) shows a shift from predominantly sheep and goat pastoralism to a more diverse array including cattle, pig, and even fish during the 4th millennium BCE. This diversification may reflect increased trade: fish from the Gulf, for example, were dried and transported hundreds of kilometers inland.

At Tell Brak, in northern Syria, a 5,000-year-old complex featured large-scale slaughter of cattle, likely for feasts that reinforced social hierarchies. The bones—hundreds of cattle—were deposited near a monumental building, suggesting that such events were central to political life.

Such findings demonstrate that animal bones are not just about food; they are about power, economy, and connections.

How You Can Get Involved

If this excites you, there are ways to participate. Many excavations in the Near East accept volunteers, and some specifically need faunal assistants. Universities like the University of Copenhagen, University College London, and Harvard offer zooarchaeology courses and field schools.

You don't need a degree to start. You can learn the basics by studying comparative osteology online or volunteering at a local museum. When you travel to a dig, bring a field guide to animal bones, a set of calipers, and a notebook. The more you practice, the better you'll become at spotting the subtle differences between a sheep and a goat.

The next time you see a pile of bones at a site, don't walk past. Those fragments are the voices of ancient economies, environments, and rituals—waiting for someone to read them.

Share this article:

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!